A comparison of design techniques between longitudinal and transverse flux motors (260-136-1)

Last updated on 12 April 2013 2:11
This has been a fascinating example, for the two machines are running "neck and neck" by most criteria. The AFM could profit by extra overhang to reduce its R2 value to make R2/0.273 = 2.46, a reduction of 1.6:1. This could be achieved by a straight increase in plate thickness...
Author(s): Laithwaite E. R.
Organisation(s): British Rail Research ;
1994
United Kingdom
Log in or register to continue
Register for free individual access
  • Unlock research, articles and more
  • Get updates on RSSB’s activities