RSSB logo
Menu
Register
  • RSSB logo
  • About RSSB
    • About Us
      Who We Are
      What We Do
    • Insights and News
      • Horizon magazine
      • RSSB Podcast
    • Key Industry Topics
      • Data Science and AI
      • Futures Lab
      • Graphic Insights
    • Groups and Committees
      Career Opportunities
    • Member Enquiries
      Newsletter Preferences
  • Services and Resources
    • Get Up To Speed with RSSB’s Services and Resources
    • Case Study Library
      Events and Webinars
    • Rail Consultancy Services
      Training
    • Railway Documentation and Drawing Services Limited
      Railway Industry Supplier Approval Scheme
    • Research Catalogue
      Standards Catalogue
  • Safety and Health
    • Rail Health and Safety Strategy
      Safety Risk Groups
      Wellbeing Groups
    • Asset Integrity
      Fatigue
      Freight Safety
    • Health and Wellbeing
      Level Crossings
      Occupational Health and Safety
    • Passenger Operations
      Passenger and Staff Assaults
      Train Operations
    • Trespass and Suicide
      Safety and Health Tools & Resources
      Common Solutions
  • Standards
    • Types of Standards and How They Work
      Defining the Future of Standards
      • Rail Standards Strategy
      • Railway Standards Code and Standards Manual
    • Using Standards
      • Latest Updates to Standards
      Standards Self-Assessments
      Rail Standards Consultations
    • Where Do We Use Standards?
      • Control, Command and Signalling
      • Data, Systems and Telematics
      • Energy
      • Infrastructure
      • Plant
      • Rolling Stock
      • Traffic Operation and Management
    • Industry Standards Coordination Committee
      Digital Railway Assurance Steering Group
    • Standards Catalogue
      Rule Book App
      Subscribe to Standards News
  • Sustainability
    • Sustainable Rail Blueprint
    • Net Zero Carbon Rail
      A Quieter Railway
      Clean Air
    • Prepared for a Changing Climate
      A Railway for Nature
      Zero Waste
      Protect and Conserve Water
    • Maximising Social Value
      Rail at the Heart of Communities
      Careers, Economy & Sustainable Growth
      People-centred Rail
    • Sustainability Tools and Resources
      Sustainable Rail Groups
  • Research
    • About the Research Programme
      Engage with the Research Programme
    • How Research Delivers Benefits
      Collaboration in Research
    • Flagship Research Activities
      • Adhesion
      • Freight Research Programme
      • Performance
    • Research Highlights - Spring 2025
      Rail Technical Strategy
    • Research Catalogue
      SPARK
  • Join RSSB
    • Join RSSB
    • International RSSB
      Becoming a Member - GB and Overseas
    • Find out Who Joins RSSB and Why
    • What our members and affiliates say
    • Membership Benefits
      Membership Offerings
      Our Business Plan
  • Membership Benefits
    • Make the most of your RSSB membership
      Membership Offerings
    • Dedicated support from our team
      Meet our Engagement Managers
    • Who Joins RSSB and Why?
    • What Our Members and Affiliates Say
    • Access to our Leading Experts
      RSSB Newsletter Preferences
Register
  • RSSB
  • About RSSB
  • Key Industry Topics
  • Graphic Insights
  • Risk Management - RSSB Graphic Insights

Risk Management - RSSB Graphic Insights

An evidence-led approach to risk management

Safety management is most effective when it is risk and evidence-based. Companies from across GB rail share safety event data. This helps them understand risk and target safety investment.   

How the industry manages safety

Taking Safe Decisions sets out the framework that rail companies use to keep people safe and meet wider business objectives. It helps them prioritise safety improvement, identify where to invest, and demonstrate legal compliance.

Click on each section to understand more about the process.



Measuring risk  

Risk can be measured using the formula: Risk = Frequency x Consequence. Frequency describes how often an event occurs. Consequence is a measure of the harm associated with the event. 

The rail industry uses Fatalities and Weighted Injuries (FWI) to measure safety performance and risk. This metric combines fatalities with different types of injury, which are weighted by severity. 

The carousel shows the different passenger injury types covered by the FWI metric. It also includes an example of an event that would fall under each injury type. 

Further details of all injury types covered by the FWI metric can be found here.

Click on the injury type to explore the weighting equivalents.

A Fatality is our baseline measure that is compared against. An example of this type is when a person dies during the derailment of a passenger train.

GB rail risk profile

The Safety Risk Model (SRM) provides a network-wide risk profile for Great Britain’s mainline railway. It has underpinned the industry’s evidence and risk-based approach to safety management since the first version was developed over 20 years ago.  

The SRM covers a wide range of events that can occur during the operation and maintenance of the railway. You can explore the model structure and hierarchy in the following graphic.

Click through the chart to reveal a subsection of the rail risk profile.

People use the SRM to understand the risk associated with different events. They can compare frequency, consequences and risk.

The graphic below shows an interactive comparison between different events. The size of the bubble represents the risk, which is a product of the frequency and the consequence. The frequency is indicated by the position along the bottom axis. The consequence is indicated by the position up the side axis.

Explore the graph below and click on the bubbles to understand more about five core risk areas.

 

Some events are rare but potentially very high consequence. Passenger train derailments are in this category. Other events occur frequently but are usually low consequence. Slips, trips and falls in stations are in this category.

The full SRM profile can be explored using the SRM interface. The interactive dashboard provides rail companies with  detailed breakdowns of the risk profile by location and operator.

Cost-benefit analysis

Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a way to compare the costs and benefits of an intervention. Our guidance on CBA explains how it can be used to inform a safety-related decision. CBA can help build a business case. It can also be used to demonstrate compliance with the legal requirement to ensure safety so far as is reasonably practicable. 

In the rail industry, safety benefits are incorporated into a CBA by multiplying the expected risk reduction by the value of preventing a fatality (VPF).

Move the sliders on either side of the scales to find where safety benefit outweighs costs.

You must implement a risk control measure unless the cost is grossly disproportionate to the safety benefit. This is one of the concepts explained in Taking Safe Decisions .

Interactive example: managing risk during adverse weather

Some assets are more likely to fail and cause a derailment hazard during extreme weather. Slowing trains reduces derailment risk. However, it also causes delays and cancellations, which inconvenience customers and can result in financial penalties for operators.

Disruption has a knock-on safety impact, too. It can lead to crowding at stations, frustrated passengers, and changes to services . These in turn increase the risk from passenger accidents, staff assaults, and other safety incidents.

The graphic below shows these safety and performance impacts for a hypothetical railway with a line speed of 100 mph. You can investigate different combinations of weather and speed restriction to see how the balance of costs and benefits changes.

When would you apply a speed restriction and what speed limit would you choose? It is important to consider the overall impact on system risk.

Move the sliders below to choose a weather condition and propose a new speed.

 

The black line shows the net reduction in safety risk. If it is to the right of the grey axis line there is an overall safety benefit from applying the speed restriction. If it to the left then the knock-on risk exceeds the reduction in derailment risk.

 

 

Haven’t found what you’re looking for?
Get in touch with our Professional Head Risk and Safety Intelligence for more information.
marcus dacre image
Marcus Dacre
Tel: 020 3142 5476
https://customer-portal.rssb.co.uk
Contact Us
Contact Details
Member Enquiries
Customer Portal
Policies & Statements
Privacy Notice
Terms of Service
Cookie Policy
Other RSSB sites
Standards Consultations
CIRAS
RISAS
RISQS
SPARK
Catalogues
Research Catalogue
Standards Catalogue
Find us on
© 2025 Rail Safety and Standards Board Ltd All Rights Reserved Rail Safety and Standards Board Ltd is Registered in England under company number 04655675