Menu

Simpler, lower cost AC electrification standards

Featured story
Podcast episode 52 looks at the revised Railway Group Standards (RGS) and new Rail Industry Standards (RIS) for AC electrification that could save the industry millions of pounds.
As part of the ongoing review process, the standards for AC electrification rolling stock and their interface have been updated. They now contain approximately 50 percent fewer requirements and are accompanied by two new RISs. These RISs contain some of the requirements that were previously in RGSs, but no longer qualify as National Technical Rules (NTRs). Examples include the lineside signage to inform drivers on the approach to a neutral section, and the dimensions used to establish the overhead contact line (OCL) zone. This zone defines the area below the OCL within which trackside assets require electrical bonding. This bonding reduces the consequential electrical risk if a broken live contact wire or catenary wire comes into contact with these assets.

 

The new standards make it possible to reduce the minimum height of the OCL in some circumstances. This will help make the future electrification of existing lines more cost effective. This change will reduce the need for expensive infrastructure interventions at existing structures where the available space is limited, such as overbridges and tunnels.

As well as removing those requirements that don’t meet the criteria for NTRs, considerable effort has been put into removing duplication of requirements. Duplication of requirements across standards has been a source of increased costs in the past, so this goes some way to eliminating unnecessary cost and complexity.

One example of a rolling stock requirement that has been removed from the RGS is for vehicle bonding. These requirements are covered in other, somewhat complex, legislation. So, rather than repeating the requirements, the new RIS now contains clearer guidance on how bonding should be applied. This gives some options as to how to meet the requirements based on the particular area of use.

The overall effect of the changes should be to improve clarity and ease of application for the requirements. It should now be easier to differentiate between a requirement which supports authorization for the energy and vehicle subsystem prior to use, and those which support the establishment of vehicle and route compatibility for a particular use. The need for third-party conformity assessments has been reduced in some areas too.

Haven’t found what you’re looking for?
Get in touch with our expert for more information.