RSSB logo
Menu
Register
  • RSSB logo
  • Ask RSSB
  • About RSSB
    • About Us
      Who We Are
      What We Do
    • Insights and News
      • RSSB Podcast
    • Groups and Committees
      Career Opportunities
      • Employee Wellbeing
    • Member Enquiries
  • Services and Resources
    • Case Study Library
    • Events and Webinars
    • Consultancy
      Training
    • Railway Documentation and Drawing Services
      Railway Industry Supplier Approval Scheme
      • Customer testimonials
    • Research Catalogue
      Standards Catalogue
  • Safety and Health
    • The Rail Health and Safety Strategy
      Safety Risk Groups
      Train Protection Strategy
      Wellbeing Groups
    • Asset Integrity
      Fatigue
      Freight Safety
      • Freight Precursor Indicator Model
    • Health and Wellbeing
      Level Crossings
      Occupational Health and Safety
      • Welfare Facilities Charter
      • Welfare facilities: Initiatives to improve access
      • Welfare facilities research and trials
    • Passenger Operations
      Passenger and Staff Assaults
      Train Operations
    • Trespass and Suicide
      Safety and Health Tools & Resources
      Common Solutions
  • Standards
    • Types of standards and how they work
      • National Technical Specification Notice guidance
      Defining the future of standards
      • Rail Standards Strategy
      • Railway Standards Code and Standards Manual
    • Using standards
      • Latest updates to standards
      Standards self-assessments
      Rail Standards Consultations
    • Where we use rail standards
      • Control, command and signalling
      • Data, systems and telematics
      • Energy
      • Infrastructure
      • Plant
      • Rolling stock
      • Traffic operation and management
    • Standards groups and committees
      Digital Railway Assurance Steering Group
    • Standards Catalogue
      Rule Book App
  • Sustainability
    • Sustainable Rail Blueprint
    • Net zero carbon rail
      • Carbon reduction
      • Your guide to carbon accounting
      A quieter railway
      Clean Air
    • Prepared for a Changing Climate
      • Climate change adaptation metrics
      A Railway for Nature
      Zero Waste
      Protect and Conserve Water
    • Maximising Social Value
      Rail at the Heart of Communities
      Careers, Economy & Sustainable Growth
      People-centred Rail
    • Sustainability Tools and Resources
      Sustainable Rail Groups
  • Research
    • About the Research Programme
      Engage with the Research Programme
    • How Research Delivers Benefits
      Collaboration in Research
      • World Congress in Rail Research
    • Flagship Research Activities
      • Adhesion
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Freight Research Programme
      • Performance
    • Research Highlights - Winter 2026
      Rail Technical Strategy
    • Research Catalogue
      SPARK
  • Join RSSB
    • Join RSSB
    • International RSSB
      Becoming a Member - GB and Overseas
    • Find out Who Joins RSSB and Why
    • What our members and affiliates say
    • Membership Benefits
      Membership Offerings
      Our Business Plan
Register
  • RSSB
  • Safety and Health
  • Trespass and Suicide
  • Trespass and Suicide - One Stop Shop
  • Risk management for trespass and suicide prevention
  • Tackling Trespass Risk
  • Evaluation of trespass interventions
  • Define and describe what is being evaluated

Define and describe what is being evaluated

28/08/2020
Share Link
It is important to define and describe what is being evaluated. This enables a shared understanding and allows comparison with other evaluations conducted elsewhere.
  • Describing the intervention

    The description should include:

    • The location(s) of the intervention (named station/s route etc);
    • The intervention(s) itself – a written description and also category of intervention (e.g. awareness/education; community engagement; environmental; physical; monitoring & surveillance; staffing and patrols and fines);
    • Intervention time scales;
    • Type of trespass being targeted;
    • Type of trespasser being targeted;
    • Time periods being targeted.

    These points may be drawn from previous trespass risk assessment.

    An example description: The installation of ‘witches’ hats’ and gates to all platforms ends at all stations in region x between January and December 2020, aiming to reduce the frequency of all forms of trespass by all types of trespassers from platform ends, with a reduction being measurable by March 2021.

  • Logic model

    A logic model describes how an intervention is expected to have an impact.  The purpose of a logic model is to provide a rational basis for identifying and defining evaluation measures and for specifying the expected link between the intervention’s inputs/outputs and its outcomes and impacts. This helps to ensure a valid set of evaluation measures are specified. A logic model usually includes:

    Inputs: What will inputted to make the intervention possible? Two examples being:

    1. funding for witches’ hats at 50 stations;
    2. training of 25 community safety staff).

    Outputs: What will the intervention deliver? Two examples being: 

    1. the installation of witches’ hats by Network Rail at 50 stations; 
    2. 250 community safety events each year).

    Outcomes: What will the intervention achieve? Two examples being: 

    1. a reduction in the ability and motivation of people to trespass via end of platforms; 
    2. increase in awareness of trespass hazards amongst local community).

    Impacts: what will be the impact of the intervention? Two examples being: 

    1. 50% reduction in frequency of end of platform trespass within three months of installation;
    2. 10% reduction in all forms of trespass).

    Impact logic model diagram

    A logic model helps to identify the inputs, outputs and outcomes that a process evaluation, as discussed below, should assess. 

    This should clearly note the expected scale of impact, the impact timescale, the type of trespass and type of trespasser(s). 

    It may not be possible to provide a numerical prediction. If so, a qualitative prediction may be given, such as “a small reduction in the number of trespass events”. 

    To avoid subjectivity and inconsistency in the description of an impact, a standard set of terms and magnitude categories can be used.  Figure 3 provides a way of categorising and describing the magnitude of impact. The categories cover the reported magnitude of impact for available trespass prevention methods. The use of an impact “band” such as 40% to 59% is consistent with the level to which predictions can be made. 

    Describing the predicted magnitude of effect diagram
Haven’t found what you’re looking for?
Get in touch with our Principal Strategy Implementation Manager for further information.
Gemma Lavery image
Gemma Lavery
Email: gemma.lavery@rssb.co.uk
Other RSSB sites
Standards Consultations
CIRAS
RISAS
RISQS
SPARK
Catalogues
Research Catalogue
Standards Catalogue
Policies & Statements
RSSB’s Gender & Ethnicity Pay Gap
Accessibility Statement
Contact us
Customer Portal
© 2026 Rail Safety and Standards Board Ltd All Rights Reserved Rail Safety and Standards Board Ltd is Registered in England under company number 04655675
Cookie Policy
Privacy Notice
Terms of Service