Menu
Project number: T1230

Useful resources to help rail companies manage fatigue risk


Updating scientific knowledge on designing shift patterns that manage fatigue risk in rail.
'Fatigue is a major risk. This work provides an evidence base to help guidance, shift patterns, and rosters.'
Ali Chegini
Director - System Safety and Health, RSSB

The challenge

Fatigue has been found to be a factor in 21% of all high-risk incidents in the rail industry. Some of the effects of serious fatigue are comparable to being over the drink driving limit: poor judgements, slow reactions, poor memory, impaired vision.

One factor that affects levels of fatigue is work patterns. The RSSB and ORR both publish numerical guidelines on shift pattern design. There have been ongoing discussions in the industry about whether different working patterns adequately manage fatigue risk, while meeting requirements to build, maintain and operate the railway. It is therefore important that there is an evidence-based set of shift pattern design guidelines for the rail industry.

What we did

RSSB conducted a literature review aimed to gather the data necessary to update and complete the existing shift pattern design guidelines.

It identified 23 papers relevant to shift patterns and fatigue, including 13 papers which present data and evidence based on rail staff. These papers cover a range of types of evidence: systematic reviews, field studies, experimental studies, surveys, and literature reviews.

Other operational roles and settings represented in the data included pilots, tram drivers, industrial plant workers, and medical staff.

Benefits delivered

The literature review publishedcan be used by companies to review how rostering practices can be improved and better aligned with current scientific knowledge. They may be used to make updates to industry guidelines in future.

Originally the research planned to build on the literature review evidence, by producing recommendations for updating numerical guidelines on roster design and delivering a set of 'good practice' example rosters.

These activities would require significant input and collaboration from many organisations across the industry to be successful. However, due to the range of changes and the current industry priorities it was agreed not to proceed with further work at this stage.